Issue - meetings

(NOTE:  In accordance with the Members’ Code of Conduct, Councillor S Hussain declared an interest in this item following reference to Knaphill Library during the debate.  The interest arose as a result of his family’s ownership of the building in which the Library was located.  The interest was such that Councillor Hussain left the Chamber during the debate on the draft response to the consultation on library services.)

The Leader of the Council, Councillor Bittleston, introduced the recommendations of the Executive in respect of the Council’s draft responses to the five public consultations being undertaken by Surrey County Council.  The five areas subject to consultation were community recycling centres, libraries and cultural services. Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND), concessionary bus travel and children’s centres.

Councillor Morales moved and Councillor Lyons seconded the following amendments:

(i)      The following be added under draft response section 2.3:  “And regrets that the proposals fail to recognise the increasing need for family support in the area around Kingsmoor Park, Westfield due to many families relocating from Sheerwater and so urge SCC to ensure there is local family provision close to this area which has significant numbers of workless and low income families.” and

(ii)      The following be added as section 2.6:  “The Council regrets the introduction of a fixed charge for universal services such as Play and learn as this charge is likely to have the most negative impact on those families in greatest need of the service.”

Both Councillor Morales and Councillor Lyons spoke in support of the amendments before the proposals were put to a vote.  In accordance with Standing Order 10.8, the names of Members voting for and against the amendment were recorded.

In favour:                      Councillors M Ali, A-M Barker, J Bond, A Boote, M Bridgeman, I Eastwood, K Howard, D Hughes, L Lyons, L Morales and M I Raja.

                                      Total in favour – 11

Against:                         Councillors H Addison, S Ashall, A Azad, D Bittleston, A Bowes, G Chrystie, K Davis, D Harlow, Mrs B Hunwicks, S Hussain, C Kemp, N Martin, R Mohammed and C Rana.

                                      Total against – 14

Present not voting:        None.

                                      Total present not voting – 0

The amendment was therefore lost by 11 votes in favour to 14 votes against.

Councillor Bond referred the Council to the draft comments in respect of the consultation on the library services.  Concerned that the wording in the draft report implied that all but the Library in Woking Town Centre would close, Councillor Bond moved and Councillor Boote seconded an amendment to remove reference to library closures from the response as follows:

The wording set out in paragraph 5.2 of the Executive report be amended with the deletion of the following wording: “and recognises that this approach will inevitably lead to fewer larger directly operated centres with centres either closing or providing access channels through other partner locations”.

In accordance with Standing Order 10.8, the names of Members voting for and against the amendment were recorded.

In  ...  view the full minutes text for item 8

Reporting Person – Ray Morgan

The Executive received a report which sought approval of the Executive to recommend to Council the Draft Consultation Responses to the five public consultations launched by Surrey County Council (SCC).  The Leader of the Council explained that SCC was trying to improve efficiency and make better use of some its spaces by using them for more services.  The Executive welcomed the opportunity to respond to the important consultations and noted that the Draft Consultation Responses could be amended before being formally agreed at Council on 6 December 2018.

Discussion ensued on the Shaping Surrey’s Community Recycling Centres (CRCs) consultation and the Executive welcomed the retention of the Martyrs Lane CRC.  The possibility of border controls for Surrey tips was raised and it was commented that such enforcement could be problematic.

REcommended to Council

That Draft Consultation Responses be approved for submission to Surrey County Council.

Reason:   To enable a response to consultations being undertaken by Surrey County Council.